[ad_1]
There’s been quite a lot of hypothesis of what Navboost is however to my information no one has pinpointed an sufficient patent that could possibly be the unique Navboost patent. This patent from 2004 carefully aligns with Navboost
So I took the few clues we now have about it and recognized a pair doubtless patents.
The clues I used to be working with are that Google Software program Engineer Amit Singhal was concerned with Navboost and had a hand in inventing it. One other clue is that Navboost dated to 2005. Lastly, the courtroom paperwork point out that Navboost was up to date in a while so there could also be different patents in there about that, which we’ll get to sooner or later however not on this article.
So I deduced that if Amit Singhal was the inventor then there can be a patent together with his title on it and certainly there may be, courting from 2004.
Out of all of the patents I noticed, the 2 most attention-grabbing had been these:
- Techniques and strategies for correlating doc topicality and recognition 2004
- Interleaving Search Outcomes 2007
This text will cope with the primary one, Techniques and strategies for correlating doc topicality and recognition courting from 2004, which aligns with the recognized timeline of Navboost courting to 2005.
Patent Does Not Point out Clicks
An attention-grabbing high quality of this patent is that it doesn’t point out clicks and I think that individuals on the lookout for the Navboost patent could have ignored it as a result of it doesn’t point out clicks.
However the patent discusses ideas associated to consumer interactions and navigational patterns that are references to clicks.
Situations The place Consumer Clicks Are Implied In The Patent
Doc Choice and Retrieval:
The patent describes a course of the place a consumer selects paperwork (which could be inferred as clicking on them) from search outcomes. These picks are used to find out the paperwork’ recognition.
Mapping Paperwork to Matters:
After paperwork are chosen by customers (via clicks), they’re mapped to a number of subjects. This mapping is a key a part of the method, because it associates paperwork with particular areas of curiosity or topics.
Consumer Navigational Patterns:
The patent continuously refers to consumer navigational patterns, which embody how customers work together with paperwork, such because the paperwork they select to click on on. These patterns are used to compute recognition scores for the paperwork.
It’s clear that consumer clicks are a basic a part of how the patent proposes to evaluate the recognition of paperwork.
By analyzing which paperwork customers select to work together with, the system can assign recognition scores to those paperwork. These scores, together with the topical relevance of the paperwork, are then used to boost the accuracy and relevance of search engine outcomes.
Patent: Consumer Interactions Are A Measure Of Reputation
The patent US8595225 makes implicit references to “consumer clicks” within the context of figuring out the recognition of paperwork. Heck, recognition is so essential to the patent that it’s within the title of the patent: Techniques and strategies for correlating doc topicality and recognition
Consumer clicks, on this context, refers back to the interactions of customers with varied paperwork, similar to net pages. These interactions are a crucial part in establishing the recognition scores for these paperwork.
The patent describes a technique the place the recognition of a doc is inferred from consumer navigational patterns, which might solely be clicks.
I’d prefer to cease right here and point out that Matt Cutts has mentioned in a video that Reputation and PageRank are two various things. Reputation is about what customers are inclined to choose and PageRank is about authority as evidenced by hyperlinks.
Matt outlined recognition:
“And so recognition in some sense is a measure of the place folks go whereas PageRank is rather more a measure of fame.”
That definition from about 2014 suits what this patent is speaking about when it comes to recognition being about the place folks go.
See Matt Cutts Explains How Google Separates Popularity From True Authority
Watch the YouTube Video: How does Google separate recognition from authority?
How The Patent Makes use of Reputation Scores
The patent describes a number of ways in which it makes use of recognition scores.
Assigning Reputation Scores:
The patent discusses assigning recognition scores to paperwork based mostly on consumer interactions such because the frequency of visits or navigation patterns (Line 1).
Per-Subject Reputation:
It talks about deriving per-topic recognition info by correlating the recognition knowledge related to every doc to particular subjects (Line 5).
Reputation Scores in Rating:
The doc describes utilizing recognition scores to order paperwork amongst a number of subjects related to every doc (Line 13).
Reputation in Doc Retrieval:
Within the context of doc retrieval, the patent outlines utilizing recognition scores for rating paperwork (Line 27).
Figuring out Reputation Primarily based on Consumer Navigation:
The method of figuring out the recognition rating for every doc, which can contain utilizing consumer navigational patterns, can be talked about (Line 37).
These cases exhibit the patent’s give attention to incorporating the recognition of paperwork, as decided by consumer interplay (clicks), into the method of rating and correlating them to particular subjects.
The method outlined within the patent suggests a extra dynamic and user-responsive technique of figuring out the relevance and significance of paperwork in search engine outcomes.
Navboost Assigns Scores To Paperwork
I’m going to cease right here to additionally point out that this patent mentions assigning scores to paperwork, which is how Google govt Eric Lehman described within the trial how Navboost labored:
Talking concerning the state of affairs the place there wasn’t quite a lot of click on knowledge, Lehman testified:
“And so I believe Navboost does sort of the pure factor, which is, within the face of that sort of uncertainty, you’re taking gentler measures. So that you may modify the rating of a doc however extra mildly than for those who had extra knowledge.”
That’s one other connection to Navboost in that the trial description and the patent describe utilizing Consumer Interplay for scoring webpages.
The extra this patent is analyzed, the extra it seems to be like what the trial paperwork described as Navboost.
Learn the patent right here:
Systems and methods for correlating document topicality and popularity
Featured Picture by Shutterstock/Sabelskaya
[ad_2]
Source link