Google Says Not All That Think They Were Hit By Helpful Content Issues Were

Danny Sullivan, the Google Search Liaison, wrote on X, “One other factor to bear in mind is that among the websites I’ve seemed into, the place somebody thinks they’ve a useful content material concern — they’re advantageous.” Which means, these websites could have seen rivals see a elevate and bounce up forward of them however their site visitors is down due to the competitors rating higher, not due to any unhelpful content material points.

“They’re rating within the high outcomes. There is not any elementary content material points. It is extra that different issues may need moved up even barely,” he added.

He wrote this some time in the past over here as nicely, saying, “However I additionally assume it is necessary to know that your content material may be nice, not have any points to appropriate, however it’s simply comparatively talking, maybe it is slipped a bit down within the rankings.” That was him addressing a particular case.

Listed here are these posts:

However after all, these seeing drastic rating declines for a lot of queries they ranked tremendous nicely for over time, assume you had been hit by this useful content material replace (if the timing of your decline was shortly after the useful content material replace rolled out in September). When you simply noticed a competitor or two outrank you, you then most likely weren’t hit by that replace.

That being mentioned, I believe most of these complaining noticed drastic and devastating declines from this useful content material replace and are praying for the day to see their web site content material rank nicely once more – before later.

Discussion board dialogue at X.